With high school sports participation reaching a record 8 million students in the 2023-24 school year according to the National Federation of State High School Associations, the question of whether athletics benefit or distract from students' development has never been more pressing. The evidence is clear: sports participation, when structured appropriately, offers substantial benefits for academic performance, mental health, and social development. But the research also reveals important nuances about dosage, equity, and the risks of overtraining that parents and educators should understand.

* * *

The academic benefits are real, but moderate

Perhaps no question concerns parents more than whether time spent on the field might come at the expense of the classroom. A 2022 meta-analysis published in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise by researchers at the University of Sydney and Australian Catholic University examined 115 studies involving more than one million students. The findings revealed a small but consistent positive association between sports participation and academic performance.

Critically, the researchers found that dosage matters. Students who participated in sports for one to two hours per week showed the strongest academic gains compared to those who played no sports or those who trained three or more hours weekly. Sports participation during school hours—through physical education classes or interscholastic programs—proved more beneficial for academic outcomes than out-of-school training. The benefits were particularly pronounced in mathematics and science.

The mechanism appears to involve changes in brain function. A systematic review published in Biomedicines in 2023 found that regular physical activity increases blood flow to the brain, promotes the release of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (which supports neural plasticity), and enhances the development of the prefrontal cortex—the region responsible for executive functions like attention, working memory, and impulse control. Research from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, one of the largest long-term studies of brain development in the United States, has shown that children who engage in organized sports demonstrate better cognitive control and attention regulation than their peers.

* * *

Mental health benefits extend beyond the playing field

Against the backdrop of what some researchers have called a youth mental health crisis, the psychological benefits of sports participation have drawn increased attention. A study published in the Sociology of Sport Journal by researchers at Ohio State University tracked high school students for three years after graduation and found that those who participated in school sports reported lower depression symptoms, reduced perceived stress, and better self-rated mental health than students who did not participate in athletics.

Team sports appear to offer particular advantages. Research published in PLOS ONE using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study examined more than 11,000 children and found that exclusive participation in team sports was associated with fewer mental health difficulties compared to non-participation. The social support, sense of belonging, and shared goal pursuit that characterize team environments seem to provide a protective buffer against psychological distress.

According to study co-author Catherine Sabiston of the University of Toronto, team sports offer heightened emphasis on group goals and social connection that provide more opportunity for learning adaptive coping strategies essential for long-term mental health.

Physical activity itself produces measurable changes in brain chemistry. Exercise stimulates the release of endorphins and serotonin—neurotransmitters that regulate mood—while reducing levels of cortisol, the stress hormone. For adolescents navigating the pressures of academic demands and social development, this neurochemical support can be significant.

* * *

The dropout problem: When good intentions go wrong

Despite these benefits, a troubling pattern has emerged. According to a 2024 clinical report from the American Academy of Pediatrics published in Pediatrics, approximately 70 percent of children drop out of organized sports by age 13. The report identifies overtraining, burnout, and overuse injuries as primary contributors to this attrition.

The data on burnout are sobering: nearly one in ten youth athletes experience burnout, and as many as 35 percent experience overtraining by the time they reach adulthood. The AAP defines overtraining as a decrease in performance due to an imbalance between training and recovery, often accompanied by persistent fatigue, impaired sleep, and mood changes. Young athletes' growing bones are less tolerant of repetitive stress than adult bones, making them more susceptible to overuse injuries.

The culprit, researchers suggest, is not sports participation itself but the intensification of youth athletics. It has become increasingly common for young athletes to participate on multiple teams simultaneously, train year-round, and specialize in a single sport at ever-younger ages. A longitudinal study published in the Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine tracked students from seventh through twelfth grade and found that the number of days students engaged in strenuous exercise progressively decreased across these years—from 4.0 days per week in seventh grade to just 2.3 days by senior year—suggesting that the structure of competitive youth sports may be driving students away from physical activity entirely.

The AAP recommends that athletes avoid training in a single sport for more hours per week than their age—so a 12-year-old should not train more than 12 hours weekly. The report also emphasizes the importance of fostering intrinsic motivation and measuring success by participation and effort rather than performance outcomes alone.

* * *

The equity gap in youth sports

Access to youth sports remains deeply unequal. According to the Aspen Institute's State of Play 2024 report, the participation gap between children from the lowest-income and highest-income households has widened from 13.6 percentage points in 2012 to 20.2 percentage points in 2024. Federal data from the National Survey of Children's Health indicates that children living in the lowest-income homes played sports at half the rate of those from the highest-income group in 2023.

The average American family now spends $1,016 annually on their child's primary sport—a 46 percent increase since 2019, roughly double the rate of overall U.S. inflation during that period. The Aspen Institute's parent survey found that half of respondents who played youth sports or have children who have played have struggled to afford the costs to participate. Children from households earning $100,000 or more are twice as likely to participate in travel sports as those from households earning under $50,000.

Racial disparities persist as well. Sports & Fitness Industry Association data shows that in 2023, 41 percent of White youth ages 6-17 regularly played sports, compared to 37 percent of Hispanic youth and 35 percent of Black youth. Notably, Black youth participation has declined from 45 percent in 2013, while Hispanic participation has grown—increasing 14 percent from 2022 to 2023 among children ages 6-12.

These disparities matter because the children who could potentially benefit most from the physical, cognitive, and social advantages of sports participation are often those least likely to have access. The growing privatization of youth sports—with travel teams, club programs, and elite training facilities increasingly replacing community-based recreation—threatens to concentrate the benefits of athletic participation among families with the most resources.

* * *

What the evidence suggests for parents and educators

The research points toward several practical implications. First, sports participation genuinely benefits most children—academically, socially, and psychologically—but the benefits are optimized at moderate doses. Encouraging children to try multiple sports rather than specializing early, limiting training hours to age-appropriate levels, and ensuring adequate rest and recovery time all help preserve the benefits while reducing risks.

Second, school-based sports programs remain particularly valuable. They provide access regardless of family income, integrate physical activity with the school day in ways that enhance learning, and offer the structure and supervision that support positive experiences. The record-high participation in high school sports—with girls' participation reaching all-time highs and the gender gap narrowing to just 5.4 percentage points—suggests these programs continue to serve an important function.

Third, adults should watch for warning signs of burnout: declining enthusiasm, persistent fatigue, mood changes, and physical complaints. When these emerge, reducing training loads, providing time away from sports, and involving mental health professionals when needed can help young athletes recover.

Finally, addressing equity gaps requires intentional effort. Schools, municipalities, and community organizations can play crucial roles in providing affordable access to sports programs, and several states have begun directing public funding toward youth sports development in underserved communities.

The evidence is clear that sports, structured appropriately, offer substantial benefits for young people. The challenge lies in ensuring that these benefits are available to all children—and that the pursuit of athletic achievement does not undermine the developmental purposes that make youth sports valuable in the first place.

Sources