Something unusual is happening in American vocational education. Trade school enrollment has grown by 10.5 percent since 2020, according to a March 2025 report from Validated Insights, and fall enrollment is projected to increase at 6.6 percent annually through 2030 — dwarfing the 0.8 percent growth rate expected for higher education broadly. The trade and technical school industry in the United States is now worth an estimated $17.5 billion, according to IBISWorld. And a growing share of this market is moving online.

That shift creates a genuine puzzle for prospective students. Some trade programs have adapted brilliantly to digital delivery, offering flexible, affordable pathways into high-demand careers. Others have no business existing on a screen. The difference between those two categories is not always obvious, especially when aggressive marketing and confusing accreditation standards muddy the picture. Meanwhile, a new generation of app-based training platforms is disrupting the traditional trade school model entirely, offering certifications for a fraction of the cost — raising the question of whether the old model can survive, and whether the new one deserves your trust.

This piece is a guide through that landscape. It explains which trades can genuinely be learned online, which cannot, how to evaluate program quality, and where the real bargains and real dangers lie.

* * *

The Online-Friendly Trades — and Their Limits

Not every trade belongs on a laptop. But more trades than you might expect have found workable online formats, especially when the work involves information systems, codes, regulations, and analysis rather than physical manipulation of materials.

Medical coding and billing is perhaps the clearest success story. The work itself is inherently digital — translating clinical documentation into standardized codes for insurance reimbursement — and the training maps naturally onto online coursework. Programs from institutions like Penn Foster and dozens of accredited community colleges teach students the ICD-10, CPT, and HCPCS coding systems entirely online, preparing them for industry certifications like the Certified Professional Coder (CPC) credential from the American Academy of Professional Coders or the Certified Billing and Coding Specialist (CBCS) from the National Healthcareer Association. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the median salary for medical records specialists was $50,250 in 2024, and the AAPC's own salary survey found that certified coders earn roughly $6,000 more annually than their uncertified counterparts. Employers broadly accept online credentials in this field, provided the program is accredited and the graduate holds a recognized certification.

Information technology certifications follow a similar logic. CompTIA's A+, Network+, and Security+ certifications — industry-standard credentials for entry-level IT professionals — can be studied for entirely online. Cybersecurity programs, cloud computing certifications, and programming bootcamps have thrived in digital formats for years, and employer acceptance is well established. Community colleges like Ivy Tech, Wake Technical, and Forsyth Tech offer affordable online IT certificate programs, often for under $200 per credit hour for in-state students.

Paralegal studies, bookkeeping, and graphic design also translate well. Each involves learning frameworks, regulations, or software tools that don't require a physical workspace, and accredited online programs exist across all three fields. Graphic design programs, in particular, have benefited from the industry's own shift toward remote collaboration — a student learning Adobe Creative Suite in their apartment is, functionally, doing the same work they would at a studio desk.

Then there are the hybrid fields — trades that involve substantial theoretical knowledge alongside mandatory hands-on components. These are where online education gets genuinely creative, and where prospective students need to pay the closest attention.

* * *

The Hybrid Model: Where Theory Meets the Physical World

Culinary arts might seem like an absurd candidate for online education. How do you learn to braise short ribs through a screen? But Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts, ranked number one on Niche's 2025 list of best culinary programs in America, has built a model that works — or at least that thousands of students and employers find credible. Escoffier's Boulder campus is the only accredited institution in the country offering fully online diploma and degree programs with culinary classes, combining virtual coursework with required industry externships where students apply their skills in real commercial kitchens. The school is accredited by the Accrediting Council for Continuing Education and Training, a federally recognized agency, and its programs also hold programmatic accreditation from the American Culinary Federation. It's not cheap — total costs can approach $37,000 — but it represents a genuine attempt to solve the online-trades puzzle.

Veterinary technology follows a similar hybrid approach. Penn Foster, one of only ten AVMA-accredited online vet tech programs in the country, delivers its four-semester associate degree almost entirely online, but requires two 225-hour clinical externships at veterinary practices. Graduates sit for the Veterinary Technician National Exam, a requirement for licensure in most states. Penn Foster reports that its graduates historically achieve VTNE pass rates well above the national average. The major veterinary hospital chains — Banfield, VCA, BluePearl — partner directly with Penn Foster, which is a strong signal that the industry takes the credential seriously.

HVAC training presents an interesting case study in how far online can go. The theoretical components — refrigerant chemistry, system design, electrical fundamentals, EPA regulations — can be taught digitally. The EPA Section 608 certification, a federal requirement for anyone working with refrigerants, can now be earned entirely online through EPA-approved testing programs. But actually installing, diagnosing, and repairing HVAC systems requires hands-on practice that no simulation can fully replicate. The best programs acknowledge this: they use online coursework for the knowledge base and then require apprenticeships or lab intensives for the physical skills.

The trades that absolutely cannot go online are the ones most people would expect. Welding requires building muscle memory with a torch under supervised conditions. Cosmetology licensing in every state mandates hundreds or thousands of hours of in-person clinical practice. Automotive repair demands physical interaction with engines and diagnostic equipment. Surgical technology requires sterile field practice in clinical settings. Electrical work involves live circuits in ways that no virtual simulation can safely approximate. For these fields, online programs that claim to offer full training should be viewed with immediate skepticism — and in many cases, state licensing boards won't accept them at all.

* * *

The $10 Disruption: App-Based Trade Training

While traditional institutions debate how to adapt their programs for online delivery, a new category of provider has emerged that doesn't much care about the old model at all.

SkillCat, a mobile app that has trained more than 300,000 technicians, offers EPA 608 certification — the same federally required credential that HVAC programs at community colleges charge $150 to $300 to prepare students for — at a price of $10. That's not a typo. The app includes all training materials, practice exams, and a proctored certification test administered via webcam, all for ten dollars. SkillCat reports a 98 percent pass rate on the EPA 608 exam. It also offers IACET-accredited trade school diplomas in HVAC, plumbing, electrical, and appliance repair, along with OSHA-10 certification and NATE exam preparation, all for $10 per month.

The obvious question is whether a $10 certification carries the same weight as one earned through a $5,000 community college program. In the case of the EPA 608, the answer is surprisingly straightforward: yes. The EPA does not distinguish between certifications based on where the test was administered, only whether the testing program is approved. SkillCat is EPA-approved. The certification is the same credential regardless of the path.

Stepful represents another model of this disruption, specifically in healthcare. Named the number one EdTech company in the United States by TIME Magazine in 2025, Stepful offers accelerated online programs for medical assistants, pharmacy technicians, and other allied health roles. Its four-month medical assistant program prepares students for the NHA Certified Clinical Medical Assistant exam, followed by an in-person externship at one of more than 8,000 clinical partner sites. The company has grown from 50 graduates in its first year to over 30,000 active students, and it has raised $56 million in venture capital. Stepful's programs cost significantly less than traditional trade school equivalents, though exact pricing varies by student and available grants.

These platforms raise a legitimate question about what trade school students are actually paying for. If the knowledge and the certification can be delivered digitally at dramatically lower cost, is the traditional trade school model charging for education — or for the campus, the staff, the administrative overhead, and the brand name?

The honest answer is: some of both. The campus-based experience offers structured scheduling, in-person mentorship, hands-on lab access, and peer learning environments that many students genuinely need. App-based training works beautifully for self-directed learners who just need the knowledge and the credential. The risk is that cost-conscious students will choose the cheapest option without considering whether they actually have the discipline and support systems to complete a self-paced program — completion rates for self-directed online learning are notoriously low across all fields of education.

* * *

The Accreditation Maze — and the Predators Lurking Inside It

Accreditation is the single most important concept for anyone evaluating an online trade program, and it is also the most confusing.

In American higher education, accreditation comes in two broad flavors: institutional accreditation, which evaluates the school as a whole, and programmatic accreditation, which evaluates specific programs within a school. Institutional accreditation is further divided into regional and national categories. Regional accreditation, granted by bodies like the Higher Learning Commission or the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, is generally considered more rigorous and is the standard for traditional colleges and universities. National accreditation, from agencies like the Distance Education Accrediting Commission or the Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges, is more common among trade schools and vocational institutions. Both types are recognized by the U.S. Department of Education, and both make a school eligible for federal financial aid.

What accreditation means in practice is this: if a school is accredited by a federally recognized agency, its students can apply for Pell Grants and federal student loans. If it's not accredited, they can't. This alone should be a bright-line filter for any prospective student. Beyond federal aid eligibility, accreditation signals that the school has been independently reviewed for academic quality, faculty credentials, and student outcomes. Programs that also hold specialized programmatic accreditation — the AVMA-CVTEA for veterinary technology, the American Culinary Federation for culinary programs, CAAHEP for health sciences — provide an additional layer of assurance.

The danger zone is the space occupied by programs that look legitimate but lack meaningful accreditation, or that hold accreditation from agencies not recognized by the Department of Education. The for-profit trade school sector has a long and ugly history here. A 2010 GAO investigation found that all fifteen for-profit colleges tested employed deceptive or questionable recruiting practices, including encouraging federal aid fraud and grossly misrepresenting graduates' salary prospects. The subsequent Senate HELP Committee report found that the largest for-profit colleges spent 23 percent of their budgets on recruitment and only 17 percent on actual instruction. For-profit students accounted for 12 percent of all postsecondary enrollment but nearly half of all student loan defaults.

The collapses of Corinthian Colleges and ITT Technical Institute resulted in billions of dollars in discharged student loans and left tens of thousands of students with worthless credentials. More recently, the Department of Education erased over $70 million in loans for former DeVry University students misled by false advertising. The FTC has continued enforcement actions against predatory schools, and in one notable case, a man was sentenced to nineteen and a half years in prison for running a fraudulent HVAC trade school in Texas.

These problems haven't gone away. A June 2025 report from the Institute for College Access and Success warned that federal oversight of predatory schools has weakened significantly, with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau halting investigations and laying off most of its enforcement staff in the education space. State consumer protection agencies are now the primary line of defense, but their resources and authority vary enormously.

For individual students, the practical implication is clear: verify accreditation independently through the Department of Education's database before enrolling anywhere. Check whether the specific program, not just the institution, meets the licensing requirements in your state for your intended career. Ask for graduation rates and job placement data, and be skeptical of any program that can't or won't provide them. If a school's admissions representatives are more aggressive than its academic advisors, that tells you something about its priorities.

* * *

State Licensing: The Variable Nobody Tells You About

Even a perfectly accredited online program can leave you unable to work if it doesn't satisfy your state's licensing requirements. And these requirements vary more than most students realize.

Cosmetology is the most obvious example. Every state requires a license to practice, and every state mandates a specific number of training hours — typically between 1,000 and 1,600 — almost all of which must be completed in person at an approved facility. No fully online cosmetology program can meet these requirements. A student who completes an online cosmetology "certificate" will find that it doesn't qualify them for licensure anywhere.

HVAC licensing varies dramatically by state. Some states require no license at all for basic HVAC work. Others, like Texas and Florida, require specific coursework, apprenticeship hours, and passage of a state exam. The EPA 608 certification is a federal requirement, but it addresses refrigerant handling specifically — it doesn't substitute for a state HVAC contractor's license. Online programs can prepare you for the EPA certification and provide foundational knowledge, but students need to research their specific state's requirements for full HVAC licensure.

Veterinary technology demonstrates how online programs can meet state requirements when designed properly. Penn Foster's AVMA-accredited program satisfies the educational prerequisites for VTNE eligibility, and the VTNE is recognized in approximately 40 states as the credentialing exam. However, individual state boards may impose additional requirements — some require jurisprudence exams, others require specific numbers of clinical hours beyond what the program provides.

The general principle is this: licensing boards care about outcomes, not delivery methods. If an online program is accredited by the relevant body and prepares students to pass the required exams, most boards will accept it. But "most" is not "all," and the exceptions can be career-ending if you discover them after you've already spent your money and time. Every prospective student should contact their state's licensing board directly before enrolling in any online trade program.

* * *

What Comes Next

The online trade school market is at an inflection point. Traditional institutions are slowly building out hybrid programs. App-based disruptors are driving down costs in ways that would have been unimaginable a decade ago. Enrollment in trade programs of all kinds continues to accelerate, driven by skepticism about the return on investment of four-year degrees and a labor market that desperately needs skilled workers — McKinsey projects that annual hiring for critical trades like welding and carpentry will outpace overall new job growth by more than twenty times through 2032.

The opportunity here is real. A well-chosen online trade program can deliver a meaningful credential in months rather than years, at a cost that doesn't require mortgaging your future. Medical coding, IT certifications, bookkeeping, paralegal studies — these are fields where online training has matured to the point of broad employer acceptance. Hybrid programs in culinary arts, veterinary technology, and healthcare offer genuinely innovative approaches to combining digital learning with hands-on practice.

But the risks are equally real. The same features that make online education accessible — low barriers to entry, minimal oversight, aggressive digital marketing — also make it fertile ground for predatory operators. The difference between a $10 SkillCat EPA certification and a $15,000 unaccredited HVAC "diploma" from a fly-by-night online school is not just a matter of price. It's the difference between a credential that means something and one that doesn't.

The best advice for anyone navigating this market is simple but demanding: start with your state's licensing requirements, not with a school's marketing materials. Verify accreditation independently. Prioritize nonprofit institutions and established community colleges, which are consistently cheaper and more accountable than their for-profit counterparts. Be open to the new platforms disrupting trade education — but apply the same scrutiny to a $10 app that you would to a $10,000 program. And if a school's admissions team contacts you before you've contacted them, proceed with extreme caution.

The skilled trades are having a moment. The question is whether the education market can rise to meet it honestly.

Sources